IBM Sterling Ideas

formerly Watson Supply Chain

Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed. Order Management, Store Engagement, Watson Order Optimizer, Inventory Visibility, CPQ and Call Center are now part of Watson Supply Chain

Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group

Control Center List processes in Rules

In an environment like ours, we have numerous file transmissions that are monitored by Control Center. There are several process names that we ignore by having a rule where the action = no operation. One option is to build multiple rules that are set to match on a distinct process name. Another option is to build a rule where the operator is reg ex and list each process name and separate the process names by the pipe symbol. While either of these options will work, option 1 can result in numerous "ignore" rules and option 2 can result in a long reg ex string and can be messy to deal with.

I would like to be able to list each process name in a separate line in the rule definition, but when this is done "all" of the conditions of the rule must be met in order to be satisfied.

Currently rule parameters have three columns: key, operator, and value. I'm not sure how to word this, but can something be added where it allows the user to say either "all" of the information must be true or "any" of the information can be true?
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Jan 8 2018
  • Uncommitted Candidate
How will this idea be used?
What is your industry?
What is the idea priority? Medium
DeveloperWorks ID DW_ID63575
Link to original RFE
  • Attach files