IBM Sterling Ideas

Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.

IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.

Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group

Requesting Automated method of running configCC for a "silent" configuration following silent install for multiple machines

When installing SCC/IBM Control Center 6.1.0.0 on RHEL, I noticed that while there is a "silent" installation option that will allow for more automation, there is no corresponding option for configuration. Running the exportConfig script gets you a copy of an existing configuration that can presumably be used on other machines, but there would be certain details - EP name being one of them - that would need changed in InstallationInfo.properties, and configCC may still need run.
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Jan 8 2018
  • Uncommitted Candidate
What is the idea priority? High
DeveloperWorks ID DW_ID96016
RTC ID RTC_ID518258
Link to original RFE http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=96016
  • Attach files
  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    18 Mar 12:19pm

    Thas is a feature, that would benefit our organisation definately.

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    28 Jan 07:25am

    same here.. this is a highly demanded feature.. any updates when it will be done?

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    24 Jan 06:13pm

    Any update on this? It's been a couple of years since this was accepted. This blocks us from having automated deployments in our cloud environments.