IBM Sterling Ideas
Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.
IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.
Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the
Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group
Per feedback regarding Fill Rate calculation
Node metrics not considering cancelled/rejected orders - Per the current product design, BUC was not considering cancelled/rejected orders while calculating the node metrics. Our engineering team is revisiting the design and I will keep you posted with the updates on this. Status - In Progress
1) Orders assigned to the store and rejected by the store (rejected, short-picked, etc) that result in cancellation must be part of the # of records send to store.
2) Orders assigned to the store and rejected by the store (rejected, short-picked, etc) that result in cancellation must be included in the denominator when calculating Fill Rate
How will this idea be used?
Accurate number of orders/lines sent to the node.
Lines that are declined by the node still need to be accounted for. Calculating fill rate metrics isn't like baseball, when "walks" don't count against the batting average.
|What is your industry?||Retail|
|What is the idea priority?||High|