IBM Sterling Ideas

Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.

IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.

Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group

WorkOrder Purge effeciency

Observation in workOrder purge agent.
1) Multiple getsJobs are getting triggered with EnterpriseCode.
2) yfs_task_queue table doesn't have EnterpriseCode column, which leads to pick unnecessary records for executeJob (multiple enterprise scenario) and execution time increases.
3) No where clause for getsJobs for not picking same taskQ record.

Teams involved:

Nikhila Kurmala (nkurmalain.ibm.com) , Anusha Dasari(anusha.dasari@in.ibm.com)
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • May 26 2020
  • Declined
How will this idea be used?

Performance of WorkOrder purge will be more efficient.

What is your industry? Retail
What is the idea priority? Medium
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Manjunath Subburathinam commented
    17 Aug 01:30pm

    Thanks for specifying the existing behavior with this agent. I see that IBM Support and Engineering has provided alternate options to speed up the agent.

    Could you please outline what other design changes you were intending to raise as part of this RFE?

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    26 May 11:03am

    Reference cases #TS003382846 and #TS002371014

  • Avatar40.8f183f721a2c86cd98fddbbe6dc46ec9
    Guest commented
    26 May 09:06am

    Note Case#TS002371014 // RTC#585658