IBM Sterling Ideas

formerly Watson Supply Chain

Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed. Order Management, Store Engagement, Watson Order Optimizer, Inventory Visibility, CPQ and Call Center are now part of Watson Supply Chain

Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group

Handling XML data Using WTX map

We have a WTX translation map from xml to Legacy format. The source xml type tree has been created with the XSD schema. Currently the map was working fine with the xml data because it is matching with type tree structure. However the client is saying now there might be a situation and possibility that their customers will send undefined xml xpaths (Refer Note1 below) in the xml file and the WTX map should not fail in this case. We known in general the map will fail because type tree structure miss mach with the xml file. Since the undefined xpaths are not been mapped/used further downstream to target Legacy systems and so we need to ignore them.
(FYI - Refer Note 2 below).
To make client happy and do not want to impact client business, we need a solution for the above mentioned.
Note1 - Elements not defined in the source type tree / xsd, also which is not known the place holder in the complex xml file.
Note2 - During map development, the xsd was used only to a create a input type tree because it contains huge structure definition. Here the map should not do a xsd schema validation and so we selected input card settings under document verification as well formed option. Another Option we selected direct xsd file in input card setting at type tree location and then selected document verification as well formed option.
  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Jan 9 2018
  • Declined
How will this idea be used?
What is your industry?
What is the idea priority? High
DeveloperWorks ID DW_ID87686
Link to original RFE
  • Attach files
  • Admin
    Luke Raiano commented
    October 08, 2019 17:36

    Native XSD/schema negate need for this