IBM Sterling Ideas
formerly Watson Supply Chain
Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed. Order Management, Store Engagement, Watson Order Optimizer, Inventory Visibility, CPQ and Call Center are now part of Watson Supply Chain
Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the
Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group
We have received the explanation that claim level rejection works as designed in the 2300 Loop of the 837 and does NOT have rejection capability in the Provider, Subscriber and Patient Loops. Based on our competitors’ capabilities and our client needs, we need to be able to reject claims (not entire transactions) for data in the Provider, Subscriber and Patient Loops.
An 837P transaction file containing 5000 claims is received, client wants to reject if Subscriber or Patient ID is not valid (not found on file in the database). Only those claim for that Subscriber/Patient should reject and all other claims for other Subscribers/Patients should continue to process and be accepted if there aren't any other failures.
An 837P transaction file containing 5000 claims is received, client wants to reject if the Provider ID is not valid (not found on file in the database). Only those claims for the Provider that fails should reject and all other claims for other Providers continue to process if there aren't any other failures.
Other software vendors have this capability and it is essential for our new clients trying to eliminate other software such as Edifecs.
How will this idea be used?
New business to reject claims at the Provider, Subscriber or Patient level.
|What is your industry?||Healthcare|
|What is the idea priority?||Urgent|
|Link to original RFE|