IBM Sterling Ideas
Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.
IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.
Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the
Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group
When an admin retires a netmap node that is no longer needed, sometimes we end up with an orphaned Functional Authority (FA) referencing a now non-existent netmap node. To prevent this from occurring, a new functionality could be created where Connect:Direct(C:D)/Control Center checks if there are any FAs referencing the netmap node that is about to be deleted. If there is an FA referencing the netmap node about to be deleted, then a pop-up in Control Center would generate saying the node can't be deleted because it is currently referenced by an FA. If that can't be done, then let the job run and fail with a return code stating the netmap node can't be deleted because it is currently referenced by an FA.
The netmap and FA could be thought of as in a parent/child relationship. The parent can't be removed if there are any dependent children.
This new setup would be useful to prevent residual access definitions (such as FAs with no corresponding netmap entry). This could prevent potential audit findings, and also, it promotes cleaner configurations.
I am unsure if this RFE should be opened under Control Center or C:D.
How will this idea be used?
As a Connect:Direct admin, i need to retire a netmap node entry. I need to ensure there are no dependent FAs associated with this node before deleting it and the this RFE would address this situation
|What is your industry?||Banking|
|What is the idea priority?||Medium|