Skip to Main Content
IBM Sterling


This portal is to open public enhancement requests for IBM Sterling products and services. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 27, 2019

File Agent Rule Definition Panel: Capability to use the same arguments in the "process name" field as in "process arguments"

We would like to create a very dynamic approach for the definition of file agent rules using the "monitor subdirecctory feature" and a model for subdirectory structures containing the cdp process file name.

 

What is your industry? Insurance
How will this idea be used?

Our file system has the structure

 

.../out/FileTransferID1

../out/FileTransferID2

../out/FileTransferID3

 

These could be real directories or symbolic links to application data locations.

The rule defines to traverse from .../out including all sub-directories.

In the "process arguments" a lot of arguments can be used. One defines a reference to "FileTransferID" section of the path.

If the same arguments could be used in "process name" the name of the cdp process file will be indirectly defined by the sub-directory structure.

As a consequence the File Agent rule definition does not need to be touched if a new directory is introduced or removed.

This follows a clear segregation of duties:

- definition of directory structures and applying correct permissions and symbolic links:     System Admins 

- definition of cdp files and FA rules:  Connect:Direct expert

 

In the consequence the rare resources of CD Experts can be protected.

  • Admin
    Chris Sanders
    Reply
    |
    Aug 28, 2020

    Thank you for your patience as we reviewed this request a bit further internally. Our dev and support members were able to synch up on your previous case and believe they understand the request better now.

    I'm pleased to say that we believe it will be possible to add substitution variables to the process name field in File Agent to allow arguments to be passed to reduce the number of rules that would need to be created. I am accepting this request as an uncommitted candidate and will look to add it to the roadmap moving forward.

    Sincerely,

    Chris Sanders

    Connect:Direct Offering Manager

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 21, 2019

    Sorry - either you tell me how to meet the needs or not. I am not going to explain it to support again and again.

  • Admin
    Chris Sanders
    Reply
    |
    Nov 20, 2019

    Thank you for opening this enhancement request with IBM. I have reviewed this request with my team and we believe it may be possible to meet your needs with existing File Agent capabilities.

    I'd like to ask that you open a case with our support team with a reference to this enhancement request. They will likely need to take a look at your FA configuration and may be able to provide suggestions that will resolve this issue. If they cannot resolve this issue I'd like to ask that you direct them to me to provide some additional context on what your needs are and what gaps exist.

    Sincerely,

    Chris Sanders

    Connect:Direct Offering Manager