IBM Sterling Ideas
Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed.
IBM is transforming its request for enhancement (RFE) process. The purpose of the transformation is to provide a more consistent experience for you to submit requests and to enable IBM product owners to respond to your requests more quickly. For more information click here.
Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the
Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group
For PCI Audits we have to confirm user info on who has access to our C:D in Functional Authorities and what their level of access is GENUSR or ADMIN, currently the export user config dumps all this info for users in Functional Authorities as well as proxies in one long report with no way to easily compare who is general user and who has admin access. We find it clunky and we have to manually remove proxy users to provide report for internal users setup under Functional Authorities and there is no easy compare to say GENUSR or ADMIN.
How will this idea be used?
As an application owner I need to provide quarterly reviews of user access to our C:D environment and an easily exportable functional authorities report with just users and their access level under functional authorities that we could pull from C:D Requester and not have to be on the actual C:D Server to export user config that is not very user friendly in terms of comparing user access in addition to it dumps all proxy users setup as well.
|What is your industry?||Computer Services|
|What is the idea priority?||High|