IBM Sterling Ideas

formerly Watson Supply Chain

Submit new product ideas for IBM Sterling solutions. Before you submit, please review existing ideas; if an idea close to yours already exists, it's better to add comments or vote on the existing idea. We will review your ideas and use them to help prioritize our product development. Best of all, the portal will automatically update you when the status of your idea has been changed. Order Management, Store Engagement, Watson Order Optimizer, Inventory Visibility, CPQ and Call Center are now part of Watson Supply Chain

Connect with IBM experts and your peers on the Supply Chain Collaboration Community and the Order Management Interest Group

Invoicing - define what constitutes ignoring the PO# for a trading partner during correlation. configuration array & toggle

Is zero an acceptable PO#? is N/A?  Today, if the invoice refers to a PO# using (0, 00, NA, NONE, N/A) the data errors out and is reflected in the Alarms > Errors section. (Data error: Invoice identifier not found)

Possible to have Settings Area to determine who/when/what to aggregate against YY po#

  • Avatar32.5fb70cce7410889e661286fd7f1897de Guest
  • Mar 27 2019
  • Uncommitted Candidate
How will this idea be used?

810 are sent to financing org (3rd party) making the aggregation against the original PO# impossible in today's BTI setup.
However, not showing the invoice even as an orphan is problematic. 
Perhaps a setting to bypass aggregating on a list of PO# is the best balance of I/O management and display/searchability.

What is your industry? Retail
What is the idea priority? Medium
DeveloperWorks ID
Link to original RFE
  • Attach files